IMA 流動資訊站

大家覺得邊一部會比較好呵

_________________
至此才醒覺原來記憶留在心底

S9500 is better

不過點解啊?
我都係考慮緊呢兩部機~
9500 個 anti-shake 係用 iso, 唔似 fz30 咁係用 optical~
苦惱中~

真係識影相既人
今本對anti-shake呢類既系統不屑一顧
因為太多方法可以避免手震
況且iso高程況下,noise控制得好, 怕咩用高iso
講攝影既人只會擔心鏡片質素如何
防手震只會對靜態主體起作用
對住d跳跳扎既細路
用高iso 加快快門反而仲有用

_________________
生係AIKI
死都係AIKI

絕對同意!!
不過防手震依樣野有總好過冇

如果iso高,contral得好,又有mega o.i.s就正啦!!

If you were referring to picture quality, then Fuji obviously has more muscle over Panasonic in this match. For regular use, I won't say IS is not useful, I love that function and is willing to pay extra when I buy Canon lens with IS, but I would say High ISO performance is MORE important then good IS function. Since both Panasonic and Fuji are famous for their noise performance, Panasonic is famous for having a lot of noise while Fuji is famous on the other end, so the choice is not difficult, I'd bet my money on Fuji anytime.

所謂既 control, 只不過係將noise grain 粒粒整 blur 左, 咩 detail 都無,
在相同快門 speed 之下, 梗係 iso 低好,
相比之下 optical anti-shake 比 iso anti-shake 好好多,
況且所有高 iso 機都可以話係有 anti-shake, 無咩特別